Electoral systems and trade-policy outcomes: the effects of personal-vote incentives on barriers to international trade, with Patrick Wagner, is now available online in Public Choice. The article is available through open access thanks to an agreement between UCL and Springer Nature.
From the abstract:
Despite established benefits in free trade, protectionism persists to varying degrees across the world. Why is that? Political institutions govern the ways in which competing trade-policy preferences are aggregated, shaping policy outcomes. The ubiquitous binary PR/plurality indicator in the trade-politics literature is divorced from comparative institutional research. We build on the latter body of research to generate a new 13-point index that captures the extent to which electoral systems incentivize personal-vote cultivation, based on a combination of established theoretical and new empirical evidence on candidate incentives. We argue that institutional incentives to pursue a personal vote are positively linked to the provision of particularistic policies, including trade protectionism. We find strong empirical support for the hypothesized relationship, and our results highlight the importance of applying parsimonious approaches to studying domestic institutions when analyzing their impact on foreign economic policy.
This project was particularly fun because it gave us an opportunity to apply Bell and Jones’s (2015) within-between random effects model, even though this generated a bit of confusion for some reviewers of early drafts. We also employed multiple imputation to ensure nonrandom missingness among the observations was not driving results, as the initial draft coincided with a bit of a revival of a missing-data debate (Lall 2016; Arel-Bundock and Pelc 2018)